Skip to content
About  |Discuss |Resources |Events |News |Contact

Less
More
Trim
Untrim
« Older
Home
Loading
Newer »

Port Alberni Cable Landing Station Sees Traffic Again

Published
by
Yves
on March 3, 2010
in Uncategorized
. 0 Comments

As Neptune’s trident has struck Port Alberni this December 8th 2009 he must have remembered the day more than a century ago when the All Red Line was completed close by at the Bamfield Cable Station in October 1902. The first Global network circling the Globe, projecting the might of the British Empire and Neptune’s first globe spanning copper belt.

I would suspect that not many current Tata Communications employees formerly from Teleglobe are aware that the Canadian All Red landing stations became part of what one day would become the COTC (Canadian Overseas Telecommunication Corporation) renamed Teleglobe in 1975. No current employee, for sure, remembers that the initial cable station was in Bamfield on Vancouver Island. The Bamfield Marine Centre happens to be located on the old cable station property and its website provides some interesting tidbits. The original cable station was constructed in 1902, with the underwater telegraph cable laid in October of the same year by the cable ship Colonia and operated by the Eastern Pacific Board (EPB). The cable ran nearly 4,000 miles across the Pacific from Bamfield to Fanning Island, an atoll in the mid-Pacific which the British annexed specifically for that purpose as they wanted the cable completely on British territory. From there the cable continued to Fiji, New Zealand and Australia. We further learn that The Canadian Pacific Railway Company constructed the Cable Station plus Bachelors Quarters and Manager’s House in 1901-1902, and that on November 1st 1902, the first two telegraph messages to encircle the globe were relayed. In 1926, a second building was constructed and at the same time, a second cable was laid via Hawaii to Suva, Fiji.

In 1950 the Canadian Government nationalized international telegraph cable assets and formed COTC taking over the Bamfield Cable Station. In 1953, the two cables were extended up the Alberni Canal and in 1959, a new state-of-the-art cable station was built in Port Alberni and the Bamfield Cable Station was shut down. The last messages were sent from Bamfield on June 20th, 1959.

The next highlight would take place in late 1963 with the inauguration of the British Commonwealth COMPAC, the first global cable system suited for telephony landing in Port Alberni. COMPAC was to a certain extent a post colonial successor of the Imperial All Red Line. The idea was to link the UK, South Africa, Sri Lanka, India, Malaysia, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and back to UK with an undersea telephone cable system ringing the world. For the Canadian portion of the ring, Teleglobe, still called COTC in those days, completed the transatlantic Cantat-1 in 1961 while the Trans Canada portion was microwave based and installed by Canadian Pacific Railways across the continent all the way to Vancouver Island. HRH, Queen Elisabeth inaugurated the COMPAC system with a call to Australia. The capacity of COMPAC was 80 telephone circuits and one telephone circuit could carry 22 telegraph channels!

Then came ANZCAN in 1984, as a replacement for COMPAC. The cable had a capacity of 1,380 telephone circuits, quite amazing compared to COMPAC twenty years earlier. The Canada-Hawaii portion of good old ANZCAN went into retirement in 1997.

The crowning achievement and grand finale at Port Alberni was the installation and activation of TPC-4 in 1992. This cable pioneered deep-sea cable branching as two cables, one leaving from Port Alberni and one from Point Arena north of San Francisco in California, joined together with at a deep-sea junction and continued as one cable to Chikura in Japan. Naysayers at the time said such undersea branching would never work but business and political considerations plus the persuasion of our VP Engineering at the time, Martin Fournier, prevailed. Needless to say that today, undersea branching is common place.

The early days of 1997 then saw TPC-5 coming on-line with two landing points in the USA, one at San Luis Obispo, California and the Northern landing at Brandon, Oregon. By then the political imperatives to have a landing point within Canadian waters had all but vanished in the context of competition, efficiency and liberalization of the telecom market. It made more economic and business sense to connect terrestrially to Bandon. The days of¨Port Alberni as a cable landing station were counted. It was a matter of how long TPC-4 would still continue to be commercially viable. Marking the end of an era, TPC-4 was decommissioned late 2003 and for the first time in more than a century no transpacific cable traffic reached or left the Canadian shores.

In the fall 2004 the cable station was sold to the University of Victoria for a most worthwhile project. The Neptune initiative is run by a consortium of university and scientific organizations, lead by the University of Victoria and received its first funding in 2003. University of Victoria bought the former Teleglobe cable landing station building on Mallory drive. The 800-kilometre cable network launched this month starts and ends in Port Alberni describing a 800 km long ring at the ocean bottom. The cable was specially built by Alcatel as it has non conventional power requirements for sensor arrays, cameras, hydrophones, automated submarine robotic vehicles and the like. How many telegraph channels could the 10 gigabit backhaul to UVic carry?

It is rejuvenating and most enjoyable to see Teleglobe’s two former cable landing stations used for natural sciences especially in these days of growing concern about global warming and sustainable development of the planet; I look forward to see the science produced by Neptune and to stream some ocean views to my laptop screen or my smartphone.

Challenges in the African Marketplace

Published
by
Steven V.
on February 23, 2010
in Emerging Markets
. 0 Comments

Telecom infrastructure and service providers in Africa are faced with unique, regional challenges. Unlike their more developed counterparts, East Africa and West Africa have numerous socioeconomic and geopolitical barriers that have undoubtedly affected the adoption of communication services.

Several months ago, East Africa had no cable capacity. While IP capacity and connectivity has since grown tremendously via the SEACOM build out, a 17,000 km cable system supporting 1.28 Tbps of capacity, the challenge of distributing the capacity, from the cable landing station to end-users, specifically those located outside of major cities, has emerged.

Along those lines, Africa is geographically distant from the rest of the world; therefore, making the cost to deploy capacity more expensive than North America or Europe for example.

Regulatory issues and government influence/control over the telecommunication market, also pose a challenge on the continent. In Kenya, for example, while the government is promoting connectivity and supporting the use of the Internet, efforts to make these services affordable and available to the masses have had little success.

Despite the global economic downturn, Africa remains one of the fastest growing telecommunications markets. As an emerging economy, Africa is increasingly becoming the focus of investors who see a huge potential in this market.

IPv6 or IPv4? What will we see in the first wave of LTE networks?

Published
by
Yves
on February 17, 2010
in Industry Trends and Mobile
. 0 Comments

All the talk early this year seems to be about LTE deployment to alleviate chronic Apple and other smartphones induced indigestion on the AT&T and other major Mobile Networks swamped by data traffic.

The telluric shift albeit the user will not care or should not notice is that when he or she will power on that smartphone or whatever the communicating Swiss Knife will be called, it will request an IP address to complete an IP based call. A device without an IP address will be rather difficult to reach and the ungodly NATword should not even be whispered. The comfort of the good old circuit switched network core will be gone in the LTE era.

It is rather timely, if not a bit last minute, that the Global Certification Forum (GCF), announced a LTE device certification scheme to be ready by the end of 2010.

Verizon, as far as I know, is the only mobile network Operator so far who officially announced IPv6 support in their devices and stated that “the device shall be assigned an IPv6 address whenever it attaches to the LTE network.”

Verizon’s commitment to IPv6 seems to be further underscored as ICSA, their independent conformity testing lab became the first one approved by NIST for USGv6 conformance testing. Congratulations, Verizon.

In the meantime, Telia Sonera claimed the world’s first commercial LTE deployment in Stockholm and Oslo in December. Has anyone confirmed what kind of IP addresses they are using, IPv4 and/or IPv6? They just announced the suppliers for their LTE network extension to 29 cities in Sweden and Norway. Let us hope the Nordic countries will continue to surprise us as they have done for a long time in telecommunications.

With all the LTE plans announced lately, it should not come as a surprise to see LTE as a prime discussion topic during the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona this month. And while it will not have the starring role, IPv6 will be best supporting actor.

With the first LTE networks coming on-line later this year it will be interesting to track compliance and interoperability.

LTE should not be fragmented in too many Short Term Evolutions. The end-user community expects seamless high quality service, to them it is ancillary if is called LTE and works in IPv4 or IPv6.

This post originally appeared on CircleID.

What Is Behind Telecom Growth in Africa

Published
by
Steven V.
on February 9, 2010
in Emerging Markets and Interconnection
. 0 Comments

Africa has the fastest growing telecommunications industry. But what is driving this growth? A primary driver is undersea cable build outs.

When it comes to cost, cable capacity is significantly cheaper than satellite. This regional growth is also fueled by the demand for high-speed, low latency connectivity. While satellite connections have an average of 600 millisecond delay, cable capacity delivers voice and data communications in less than half the time.

The inherent negative aspects of satellite communications fueled the launch of the SEACOM cable system, the first undersea submarine cable system that connects the African continent to Europe, Asia and India. Through this build out, Tata Communications is able to cost-effectively and efficiently provide fully integrated network services from South Africa, Mozambique, Tanzania and Kenya to its networks in Europe, Asia and India.

The abundance of capacity leads to the creation of a whole new industry for high-speed connectivity from call centers to growing the Internet. To that end, from August 2009 to now, Tata Communications has doubled the entire IP connectivity in Kenya, going from #3 in terms of connectivity to the #1 position.

Parts of Africa already have many attractive elements in place, including an underemployed workforce, good language skills, low labor costs and good time zone locations with European- and Middle Eastern-based companies, which could be harnessed through the proliferation of more connectivity to the rest of the world to support Call Centre, software development, and other similar services.

Why Collaboration Matters in an IP Transition

Published
by
Jim
on February 2, 2010
in Industry Trends and Internet
. 0 Comments

Carriers are examining different strategies to staff to meet the needs of an IP transition. Some carriers will be able to leverage existing in-house expertise at the data layer, while others will look outside the organization to hire a few key players to lead the transition. Some carriers will turn toward third-party providers for access to transition expertise.

However, in every model, close collaboration will multiply the effectiveness of your staff. The people in place need to be in a position to work together, not in segregated silos, to understand and develop the new skill sets they need. Cross-training between voice and data network teams, for instance, can lead to VoIP experts, who can in turn evangelize entire teams.

Even those organizations relying on third-party experts will need in-house staff knowledgeable enough to challenge assumptions around design decisions, network-based policies, or business processes in order to drive the best results.

There are a number of options now available to carriers as they make the transition into IP based networks, however it is up to each carrier to determine the models that meet their business objectives, their personnel core competencies as well as their internal system infrastructure goals in order to successfully plan and execute their transition intentions with the right staffing skills, experience and capabilities.

Faster Innovation Made Concrete

Published
by
Tata Communications Team
on January 26, 2010
in Internet
. 0 Comments

One of the advantages frequently mentioned for IP-based voice networks is reducing timeframes to roll out new and innovative services. Tracing the source of this advantage goes all the way back to the differences in underlying architecture between IP and TDM networks.

IP networks adhere to the OSI Model to separate conceptually similar network functions into layers. Within a network, each layer may be controlled by separate software, hardware, locations, or even organizations.

By contrast, in the TDM world, leading equipment manufactures such as Nortel bundled the various functions involved in managing and controlling voice networks into big switches. To release a new feature, manufacturers had to consider the product cycle of an entire, complex, piece of equipment. Further, high upfront expenses to upgrade and replace switches slowed the pace of adoption on the carrier end.

By moving to IP, service providers can break each component down and situate it in the network, logically and physically. Each piece then scales and innovates on its own. Simpler product roadmaps, lower prices and more competition all lead to shorter timeframes between new releases, and lower barriers to adopt innovative new features.

IPv6: a lost decade

Published
by
Yves
on January 19, 2010
in Industry Trends and Internet
. 0 Comments

A ‘decade from hell’, according to Times Magazine, a ‘dazing decade’ says Newsweek. In Copenhagen, at the Climate Change Conference, the World Meteorological Organization talked of the ‘hottest decade on record’. BusinessWeek characterized the decade as one of ‘innovation interrupted’. All this gloom made me wonder how to qualify our IPv6 decade? Most of Jordi Palet’s ten-year-old “IPv6: Status Around the World” could have been written last month, including quotes by our internet luminaries. A lost decade?

The early years were punctuated by the Tony Hain – Geoff Huston joust whether address exhaustion would be as soon as 2008 or as late as 2020 while others where dreaming of killer applications and associated riches. The burst of the internet and telecom bubbles dampened the early enthusiasm for a while as the internet wasn’t doubling every three months after all. It took some years to soak up the excess bandwidth. Research and Education networks like internet2 in the States and Canarie in Canada moved along pushing the IPv6 envelope becoming dual stack as early as 2002, but this did not propagate toward the edges. The problem was and still remains to a large degree that campuses and labs did not have immediate need or justification to follow. Some forward looking Tier-1 internet traffic carriers started to include IPv6 in their calls for tender as part of the regular upgrade cycle but here also IPv6 adoption did not propagate downward. The second half of the decade saw the internet continuing to grow more than 50% yearly and they got rewarded as their network cores became dual stack ready riding the coattails of the upgrade cycle. Fifty plus percent annual growth does not a lost decade make.

What was overlooked, like so often, is that progress depends on the confluence of advances on several technology fronts and on reaching critical masses of users. Parallel progress in broadband access deployment, in processing power and in storage combined with growing affordability catalyzed dematerialization of the distribution of news, libraries, music and video. Even shopping and even some face to face meetings were affected. Licking the wounds after the telecom bubble, the wisdom of “build and they will come” was, for a time, dubious. However, the logjams of bandwidth, processing power and storage bottlenecks broke with some synchronicity and the time had come for bandwidth gobblers like YouTube, Hulu and the Social Networking Commons to blossom. Google and Yahoo made these masses of information searchable by humans and cashed in on the advertising dollars flowing to the internet.

Telecom highlights of the last decade? The bubble, the world cutting the umbilical cord going mobile, prevalence of high speed internet access, the ascent of Google, the Apple iPhone.

The next decade? What about six hundred million FTTx subscribers, six billion humans with mobile communicating smart devices, sixty billion communicating ‘things’. IPv6 is prevalent by 2006 and we finally write about something else. Abundance of IP addresses pushes virtualization further; virtual servers live in virtual clouds which follow the sun and winds and circle the earth on an eternal quest for the most energy and cost efficient physical datacenters. The 5,000th exoplanet will be catalogued (415 are known today) and indisputable evidence for extraterrestrial life will be found.

No decade has ever been lost, evolution just does not progress in a linear fashion. Imagine if we had written a summary of the first decade of the century in late December 1909. The first ten years were extraordinary while the following ten would really become a ‘‘decade of hell’’ for tens of millions who happily celebrated New Year 1910. In retrospect our contemporary last decade was not that bad after all.

This post orginally appeared on CircleID.

The Many Facets of Cost Savings

Published
by
Tata Communications Team
on January 12, 2010
in Industry Trends and Internet
. 0 Comments

Most carriers are now delivering multiple types of services and applications for customers, or if not now, have plans to do so shortly, and the vast majority of these services are being delivered over IP. Many of these services, such as IPTV or videoconferencing, have bandwidth needs that are much more intensive than that of voice, so that the IP transport networks are increasingly dwarfing TDM infrastructure.

Size has further advantages for the IP marketplace. The per-port cost for VoIP over TDM is already much lower, but unlike TDM equipment manufacturers, IP equipment providers are continuing to focus on decreasing the per-port costs of their solutions.

As equipment providers continue to innovate, the gap in per-port cost between IP and TDM will only increase, offering further incentives for carriers to hasten the transition to IP.

Staffing to Meet an IP Transition

Published
by
Jim
on January 5, 2010
in Internet
. 0 Comments

The skill sets that your staffs are going to need now are not the same as those they will need during and after an IP transition. Your voice and network staffs have probably already thought through these issues, but what about your back office and systems integration teams? They will need to come up to speed on new devices & protocols, providing additional data fields and points of interconnect which will drive changes in techniques for retrieval, delivery & mediation, inducing updated architectures and modeling for existing system adjustments and possibly set in motion initiatives toward new system implementations.

In order to meet the expertise demand it is imperative that Organizations tap into the significant pool of IP voice experience available today, and proper recruiting can help bring in key transition leaders. In order to leverage these resources it will be critical to expand and conduct training and knowledge sharing to develop deep and long-term expertise in your team. Online training, boot camps, vendor-driven training and peer training are all good routes to explore to assist employees with the willingness and capability to learn to capture new skills.

Even individual employees can take meaningful, proactive steps to prepare for an IP transition. There is a wealth of online resources that can be leveraged, including whitepapers, research effort, standards bodies, books and simulations that are free or low cost, and each of these options can provide meaningful expertise that can be leveraged for future growth.

Billing Across the IP Interconnect

Published
by
Tata Communications Team
on December 29, 2009
in Bilaterals, Industry Trends, Interconnection and VoIP
. 0 Comments

So far, VoIP-based bilateral interconnects have followed traditional industry billing models of either bilateral agreements, or billing on an A-Z rate sheet. Most interconnections have been between incumbents or wholesale carriers seeking increased flexibility and incremental cost efficiencies in traffic exchange, not new ways to do business.

However, emerging interconnection models, including voice peering and IPX, offer much more potential to change traditional billing arrangements by increasing the number of operators for whom a bilateral connection becomes commercially interesting.

Many of these retail service providers, such as mobile operators or cable companies, are looking at ways that new pricing models could bring additional value to their offerings. Sister companies within a mobile group may consider foregoing settlement on traffic entirely, and providers may evaluate a wider variety of potential peering partners with whom they have roughly equal traffic flow – such as a cable company and mobile operator within the same market.

The result may be a significant evolution in the value proposition of wholesale carriers toward a transit-only model, and one as well where integration expertise, flexibility and the ability to enable smooth interworking between diverse environments becomes comparatively more critical.


Categories

  • Bilaterals
  • Emerging Markets
  • Events
  • Industry Trends
  • Interconnection
  • Internet
  • IP Telephony
  • Mobile
  • Outsourcing
  • Standards
  • Uncategorized
  • VoIP

Recent Comments

  • marcblanchet on IPv6: A Case of Confirmation Bias
  • Rob_S on Understanding VoIP Trends
  • Rob_S on Understanding VoIP Trends
  • Govind Mishra on Managing the Transition to IP

Request Email Updates

Your email:

Subscribe   Unsubscribe

Archives

  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

 

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Blogroll

  • CircleID
  • GigaOM
  • go6
  • Greg Galitizne’s VoIP Authority Blog
  • Jeff Pulver Blog
  • Streaming Media
  • Telephony Unfiltered
  • The VoIP Weblog
  • TMCnet
  • Tom Keating’s VoIP and Gadget Blog
  • VoIP Peering
  • VOIP Watch
  • WiMax.com

RSS Feed

RSS Feed

Comments Feed
Join Us on Twitter


32 queries. 0.3580 seconds.